This has been in interesting few weeks. As several of us are working together to keep a good thing going – the community of the KnitDesign group – I have been amuzed to see how many folks do not read even the simpliest of directions,

And while doing my monthly “delete messages” I re-read a number of thoughts written by others …. well lets just skip the rest of the twisted paths of my thought processes…. Here is what they led to:

It occurs to me that part of the problem in understanding, among other things, copyrights are the underlying semantics for words used in the discussion.

The following definitions are from the online version of Merriam-Webster

PATTERN:
1: a form or model proposed for imitation
2: something designed or used as a model for making things i.e., a sewing pattern

DESIGN:
1: to create, fashion, execute, or construct according to plan

AUTHOR:
1 a: one that originates or creates :

– as some have mentioned, There are many elements to “Design” but I think if we put the three words together,

PATTERN DESIGN AUTHOR

It gets a bit easier to see at what point “it becomes your own” and when you can lay claim EVEN for utilitarian objects, to copyrights. (or see where you may be infringing)

In other words,

If you did not start with a blank piece of paper, then you did not DESIGN it and so have no copyright to claim.

Peace of the Season

Wheat

When you read as many NeedleArts related groups as I do, hardly a week goes by that someone is not looking for instructions related to a “licensed” logo they want to use in an afghan or a pillow or any other number of useful things to decorate the TV room of devoted team fans.

The NFL & MLB have a web site set up JUST to give out preliminary licensing info, including if you don’t have $100,000 to hand over up front for the minimum first year royalties, do not even submit an application.

Here’s the excerpt that proves yet again, if you have to ask the price, you probably can’t afford it

2. Minimum Requirements. In order for your unsolicited proposal to be considered for the NFLP licensing program, your company MUST: …

c. Have the ability to pay 100% of minimum royalty guarantee upon execution of a license agreement (typically about $100,000 per year) and be able to generate sales sufficient to meet the minimum royalty guarantee on a yearly basis;

d. Maintain from a licensed and admitted insurance carrier with a rating not less than A-VIII from an A.M. Best-rated insurance company a Comprehensive Commercial General Liability policy in an amount of Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) per occurrence and Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00) in the aggregate; and

Probably explains why there are no “team” needlework patterns & charts “in print”

I doubt we could sell enough before some of Robin Hood Rationalizers had them copied and “Mulitplied” throughout the internet.

Whenever I need an acid dose of Yarn commentary, I spend a few minutes visiting “What Not” blogs.

Often times I agree -especially when “Fun Fur” is involved – although it has its place, like maybe for the manes and tails of Knitting At Knoon’s Safari Animals

Certainly much of what is being offered today deserves at least a passing “What Were They Thinking”

Although it should be pretty obvious, quite Simply they may not have been.

• Besides, they have every right to their opinions. What I don’t accept is the claim it is not personal. Satiric humor is always personal.
• Ridicule is always personal. Both are sometimes amusing, but always personal.
• So… IF you are going to play the dozens, at least be honest about it

.

Now to those passing thoughts or some might say, some snits & tizzys:

1. Why do the author and many of the commentators fear what is obviously intended as art

2. Why is the recurring commentary theme almost invariable related to “fit” – and it is the same over and over. Always talking about how the style is not fitted at the waist, shaped to the human figure.

Do the blogger and her commentators realize that some of the designs were not intended for either the anorexic waif or the hourglass figure shapes. Probably not, at least not anymore than so many of the those offering their work have “done their homework” in order to properly author a pattern.

3. One wonders what they look like and what they choose for themselves, but like so many who hide behind a “screen name” and a “free” server, we may never know.

So with a small WARNING, the following are NOT G-Rated and likely will offend many – but then you are reading this blog, so although I avoid profanity and sexual content, you likely can take strong opinions – even if written by those lacking the courage of convictions to sign their name.

Here are the links:

• What Not To Crochet
• What Not To Knit

Intriguing Thought For the Day

Or is it all just business