» Currently browsing: It Is All Just Business
August 19th, 2007 at 00:07 am »
Comments (2)
Let me be really clear.

© MyMarkDesigns
|
I have no problem with those who make the decision to share their own intellectual property, aka/Complimentary Patterns as a sampling for those interested in their patterns, charts and instructions.
Nor is there any reason, why, if these gifts suit your needs - artisitic or budgetary, should not continue to use and enjoy legitimately acquired patterns, charts or instructions…
|
I reserve my distress for those who Steal and who help others to Steal
Unfortunately for us all because in end,
STEALING even on a small scale HARMS US ALL!
So why am I in such a Snit and Tizzy?
Cumulative effect, including a recent comment that showed how little the work of serious Pattern Authors is appreciated
“… after all, how tough can it be to be a designer, seems there are new ones every week….”
But even worse is when members of the Publishing community enable these thefts.
How does that occur?
In a in hobby groups, someone asked for a pattern. Several folks provided information on where to buy the instructions. Others point to home domains of various Design Authors and Self Publishers for Complimentary and Patterns for Sale.
Others also provide a link to a site that has copied that copyrighted pattern and was “sharing it” on the internet. It is this form of THEFT, that is a problem.
The problem is made worse when that person has a very recognizable name, a person with a recognizable name such as an officer of a group dedicated to a particular craft, or a teacher an an event or what really makes me crazy, is published, and “known” as a “professional” in the industry but is helping to steal from her peers.
BUT I still try to give’em the benefit of the doubt so try to “write off the list”
“Did you realize that the site you recommended is one of the worst on the Internet for wholesale “sharing” of copyrighted information?
The replies included :
“I was just trying to help…
…besides it is already done, so I did not do anything wrong…
…well maybe they cannot afford to buy the book…
…I know, but if they read my message maybe they will go to my website and buy one of my patterns….”
Obviously it is not going to do much good with these folks to try to explain that each time someone with “Professional” standing aids and abets in improper use of Intellectual property they are giving their blessing.
But I am even an optimist, maybe I should be a bit more blunt, but still trying to keep the response sub-atomic and I reply…
“okay, so if I take your pattern called “whatever” and post it as a free pattern, and then provide the link to every hobby group I can find - that is okay with you? Thanks for letting me know so I can let people know you don’t mind your work being stolen and misused”
Since no one has ever answered that email, let me be clear
It is NOT, because each time someone rationalizes that helping other to steal is not the same as stealing; I would remind them about that those who “aid and abet” are just as guilty.
It does not matter if you drive the get-away car, or go into the bank and remove the money by force, you still get charged with bank robbery.
It’s sort of like keeping the money when a clerk gives you too much change. Sure it was thier mistake but if you know the truth, it is still stealing - even if you don’t get caught.
So do a designing author a favor, the next time you find yourself rationalizing you are not doing anything wrong by copying, sharing, or providing a link to stolen property -
When you are tempted to rationalize your behavior as something you are ENTITLED to have simply because you cannot afford to buy and obtain it properly.
Are you really entitled to have something simply because you “want it” - does that exempt you from the law - whether you are caught or not. Do you really want to be the kind of person who knowingly steal or helps another to do so?
Stop and ask yourself, are you aiding and abeting?
And if you are helping other to steal, what kind of an example are you setting?
May the publishing community needs to create a Domain Of Shame
listing the name, real or screen of those know to engage in
Stealing & Distributing the Intellectual Property of Others.
Wheat
* Imagine Logo courtesy Monique Keylon,
You can read the story of its origins at My Mark Designs
Trackback URI:
http://wheatcarr.com/it-is-all-just-business/are-you-entitled-to-you-aid-abet.php/trackback
Be sure to let me know what
you think..

July 25th, 2007 at 00:37 am »
Comments (1)
Crochet As The New Knitting -
Part IV:
Retailers & Crochet Consumers
Retailers need to realize there is growing segment in the yarn community who have been exposed to and have been enamoured of “Yarn Store Yarns” for Crochet.
It is true, that based on harsh experience many who crochet have not had the most positive of experiences, some of the fault is the attitude they bring in the door.
Yet, more of it is likely a defensive response by the shop owner or staff because they are not sure they possess the necessary skills to properly support the Crochet customer in the way they (The Retailer) want to be able to serve their customer.
Nor, should Retailers believe that all past behavior is the unbreakable rule. An opportunity exists to increase your sales thru common courtesy. So what if they initially only buy from the Sale Bin. You did want to sell that stuff didn’t you?
At a shop recently opened in my area, she has a begun monthly stitching night. The Group was quite diverse including a small cadre of those who can knit but prefer not to. We had an interesting discussion about why Yarn Shops seem to be Crochet Unfriendly. Typical of many of the shops opened in the last few years, the shop owner is rather new to the business.
Atypical is that she is completely upfront about her lack of indepth knowledge and has gone out of her way to hire ‘experts’ who can assist her customers in the many ways of using yarn.
I explained that, in my opinion, it really has nothing to do with Crochet - although changing in the last few years, reports and reality of clique-ishness in “local shops” for any needle arts have been rampant for years. You can read all about that in just about any “Knit Group”
Add in the challenge of possibly not having the skill set to properly support Crochet, with a smidgeon of Customer Attitude because they have not had happy experiences in other shops, and I sincerely believe that most of what is perceived as snootiness about crochet is really just a very human reaction defensive reaction caused by fully understanding something.
It is just so hard to say “I don’t Know” when you are in the position of thinking it paramont to the be the expert.
If Retailers recognize this and explain it to their staff, then it will help them to create the Retailer/Consumer relationships that benefit both.
It is neither rational or reasonable for the consumer to expect a retailer to stock merchandise that that is unprofitable. If Crocheters want free patterns and cheap tools and low cost yarns, they need to shop elsewhere.
From a shop owner perspective.
No, Crochet is NOT the New Knitting…
but why not make them feel welcome, perhaps invest a bit of time in learning more about Crochet and at least carry a few patterns, books and tools for this craft, they will see this become an increasing portion of their sales.
Don’t they deserve the same courtesy and respect you give to other user of yarn?
Maybe I need to offer a class at TNNA on making your shop “Crochet Friendly” without breaking the Open to Buy Budget Let me go make a note to include cost of a Nerf Ball Bat to use on those who forgot to knock off the chip before they came in the door.
Wheat
To comment by email, write to Email-Comment at YARNandTHREAD net - be sure to mention if your comments may be added to “What Wheat Wrote”
Be sure to let me know what
you think..

July 19th, 2007 at 00:01 am »
Comments (1)Is Crochet The New Knitting? -
Part II : Crochet
In The Merchant Mall
Okay so the CGOA annual conference Chainlink was last week. Health issues kept me home, and that may be part of why I am cranky
However, I am also cranky because of the usual post-Chainlink complaints about the Merchant Mall not having enough Crochet.
Some of us did a fair amount of post show consumer research last year. What we found out when we asked enough questions “Not Enough Crochet Stuff” was really code for
No Chain Store Type yarns at Cheap prices.
Well since Michael’s Wal-Mart & Hobby Lobby did not take a booth and these products cannot easily be offered profitably by Independent shops, you are unlikely to find them at a show like Stitches or the Knit & Crochet Show. The Products offered are and should be what the Merchant believes will be profitable.
The influence of the hobby guild is & should be primarily in class choices. And No Crocheter should be complaining about the quality of the education that is routinely offered at CGOA and TKGA’s respective annual conferences.
I can also tell you with complete certainty that Knit and Crochet show management encourages the Merchants to bring Crochet products to BOTH shows (even though the Fall show is technically the TKGA/Knitting event) and each offers classes of interest to the other.
But you cannot pay booth fees by selling products that are not profitable.
I can also tell you why as someone who has run “The Almost No Knitting Booth” at several events I will no longer able to give such total support to the Needle Art I personally enjoy so very much.
Why? If I had a $1 for every time I over heard, “Oh I am so glad she brought that so I could see it… now I know I want it, I can order it Online “cheaper”. - the shows would have been profitable instead of marginal.
I know at least one merchant who will not return to the Knit & Crochet event. Why? Well she went to the trouble to bring *many* Crochet Models, The Patterns and the yarn. She sold lots of patterns, a few tools (although most told her they will get those on line since it would be cheaper) and then bought the yarn from the discounters ) that’s right to her face, said they would *not* be supporting her for bringing Crochet items, they would spend the bulk of their money elsewhere.
This Retailer had invested in models, patterns and tools, she is knowledgeable and offered classes in her shop - until now. It is sad for the Crochet community that we are going to lose her as a resource.
If Crochet shoppers at a Crochet Conference don’t support the Retailers, it no longer makes sense to beat our heads against that wall.
If Crocheters continue to demonstrate they are not profitable customer, Retailers will be forced to discontinue offering Crochet related products.
If you cannot afford these products, there is no need to be rude or abrasive about it. Just accept your own reality and buy and use what you can afford.
Just as a designers cannot afford to continue to invest in developing well written patterns, properly sized, tech edited and attractively presented if they are not purchased. But we already had that discussion last week.
If you just want to window shop, please have the courtesy to be polite. Not berate me or others because we have to price our goods to make a living. This is not our hobby it is how we put food on the table.
If you want Crochet products to be at the shows, then you are going to support the people who provide the supplies - if not, then you need to find service elsewhere cause we are going to be looking for an easier way to make a living.
There is a new show on the horizon coming in November to Orlando. We will devote a portion of our booth to Crochet, but there will be quite a wide selection of other “String Stuff” as well. Why? well if you want me or any other retailer to sell it, we have to make a profit.
Looking forward to your Comments and Suggestions on how we can “Make It So”
Wheat
Comments“>Not Registered to Comment? Just click here
If you email, please let me know if I may add your comments to the blog (with or without your name)
Coming Tomorrow:
Part III: I can Knit, But I prefer to Crochet
Be sure to let me know what
you think..

July 18th, 2007 at 09:09 am »
Comments (2)This particular rant has been brewing in my head for quite a long time.
For those who keep asking (as if repeating it would make it true) …
No, Crochet Is NOT The New Knitting? -
Part I : NeedleWork, Crochet,
The LYS (Local Yarn Shop) & Wal-Mart
I love Crochet. I have been supporting Crochet in the LYS (Local Yarn Shop) Network for a VERY VERY LONG TIME. As a result, I have taken a LOT of heat in every venue imaginable when the so-called Professionals did a number of stupid things particularly over the last 10-12 years which have and continue to alienate the established LYS network.
Repeating I LOVE Crochet - I wish Every LYS (local Yarn Shop) had more tools - but the nonsense that an LYS does not stock yarns for crochet has to stop. It is just not true especially now with so many knitters excited about Lace - the shops are bulging with fingering, sport and DK’s (all of which have always been there) “Sock” yarns make wonderful and washable crochet garments.
If you want to say you cannot afford the yarns offered in the LYS, that is honest - saying they don’t have yarns suitable for crochet is just an ugly untruth.
I intensely dislike the commentary in various needle arts hobby discussion groups implying the world will end if they can’t buy cheap supplies. Or carrying on about not having access to the internet. There continue to be several excellent “catalog” merchants who sell the lower priced yarns (and quite a few of the mid-range “yarn store yarns” as well)
Just because I cannot afford quivit or a porsche 911 does not make the seller evil. It means I have to decide how to live happily within my means - Which happens to include driving a 20+ year old car so I have the monthly car payment for other purposes - like food, medicine and shelter
Nor will Wal-Mart’s phasing out of needlework mean the end of supply. People stitched *long before* either Wal-Mart or the World Wide Web existed. The catalog and on-line retailers as well as the many independent shops will continue to be there. They don’t require paypal or even a checking account. Cash & Money Orders are acceptable.
Here is a quote from the announcement made to Wal-Mart’s Suppliers and released to the industry press (you can read the newsbrief and one comment at: Creative Leisure News
- “As just discussed, you are aware that we are downsizing departments with declining categories. We continue to reduce space in these categories to allow for increased space in growth categories. As a result we continue to evaluate and where appropriate make adjustments as needed. As a result in week 34 this year, we will be deleting stitchery from 2642 stores. Our goal is to be out of stitchery 100% by Fall 2008. Please make adjustments in your forecasts and inventory using the spreadsheet attached outlining by item current and new store count for week 34.”
So here is my question for all those who think they are “entitled” to deals at their local yarn shop:
Please tell me how, if Wal-Mart with its HUGE Buying Power used to pressure its suppliers, cannot have a profitable Needlework department… you think an LYS can manage to stay in business with its higher costs if they discount.
Exactly what incentive do they have to stock and sell unprofitable merchandise.
Long as you are thinking, please explain to me why, if, on average, 90% of a shop;s customers already understand the value of the products offerd and are happy with those products, the pricing and are already buying multiple skeins at full price - most of the time, why should these shops abandon common sense and start discounting.
Is Crochet the New Knitting.
No not today and probably not in this decade,
But it could be eventually if we all work together
Looking forward to your Comments and Suggestions on how we can “Make It So”
Wheat
Not Registered to Comment? Just click here
If you email, please let me know if I may add your comments to the blog (with or without your name)
Coming Tomorrow:
Part II: Crochet In The Merchant Mall…
Be sure to let me know what
you think..

June 14th, 2007 at 13:00 pm »
Comments (4)This is NOT a criticism of the many publishers with whom Designers made past contracts, although some think it should be.
Contracts based on common past practices may not have been in a Designer’s long term best interest, they are/were common business practice and history that is past.
This IS about how our world is evolving and the new challenges and issues presented by our new, digital world.
Remember how good you felt when you negotiated that magic “Rights revert to the designer when the publication goes out of print” clause?
(more…)
Be sure to let me know what
you think..
